As a property manager, you’re always balancing the cost of operations with the need for high-quality service. One of the biggest decisions you face is whether to hire in-house staff or outsource tasks to virtual assistants. While traditional staffing models come with benefits, virtual assistants are increasingly becoming the smarter choice for property management professionals focused on cost savings and efficiency.
Cost Comparison: In-House Staff vs. Virtual Assistants
1. Salary and Benefits
In-house staff members come with fixed salaries, benefits, and overhead costs. On average, hiring a leasing coordinator or admin assistant costs property managers $50,000-$70,000 annually. Add benefits, and that number can rise to $80,000 per employee!
By contrast, a skilled virtual assistant costs $15,000-$25,000 annually for comparable services, with no added expenses for healthcare, retirement contributions, or office equipment.
Replacing one in-house admin role with a VA saves $40,000+ per year. That’s a lot!
2. Workspace and Equipment
In-house employees require office space, computers, phones, and other equipment. If you’re leasing office space, each employee adds to your square footage needs—and your expenses.
VAs work remotely, eliminating the need for additional space and resources. This can save property managers up to $5,000 per employee annually in office costs.
3. Scalability
Hiring in-house staff ties your costs to your headcount. If your property portfolio grows, you’ll need to hire additional employees, which means onboarding, training, and additional overhead. Virtual assistants are highly scalable, allowing you to bring on extra help as needed without the long-term financial commitment.
Fact: Virtual teams can manage 30% more units than in-house teams of the same size.
4. Productivity and Flexibility
In-house employees typically work within standard business hours, which may leave gaps in coverage. VAs can work across time zones or outside regular hours, ensuring tenant inquiries and maintenance requests are addressed promptly. This leads to higher tenant satisfaction without requiring overtime pay.
💡 Example: Avoiding overtime costs can save you $10,000 annually per employee.
5. Specialized Skills Without Full-Time Costs
Need someone for a specific task like billing, social media management, or tenant communication? Hiring in-house for specialized skills often means paying full-time wages for part-time work. VAs provide expertise on demand, so you only pay for the hours you need.💡 Savings: Save up to 50% by outsourcing specialized tasks to a VA instead of hiring a full-time employee.
What can you do with the savings?
By switching from in-house staff to virtual assistants, you can reinvest in:
- Marketing vacant units for higher visibility and faster leasing.
- Upgrades to properties that increase tenant satisfaction.
- Hiring additional support during peak seasons without long-term costs.
Conclusion: Smarter Staffing, Bigger Savings
In-house staff has its place, but virtual assistants offer a flexible, cost-effective solution for property managers who want to optimize their operations. From tenant communication to billing and marketing, VAs deliver high-quality results without the overhead.
Are you ready to lower your staffing costs and increase efficiency? Let’s connect to discuss how virtual assistants can transform your property management strategy.
💬 Join our mailing list to see how $15k works better.
